Real-world cost-effectiveness of etonogestrel implants compared to long-term and short term reversible contraceptive methods in France.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of etonogestrel implants compared to other long-term and short-term reversible contraceptive methods available in France. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 6-year Markov model compared effectiveness between the implant and six other contraceptive methods in sexually active, not-pregnancy-seeking French females of reproductive age. Contraception efficacy, switch rates and outcomes were based on French current medical practice. Incremental CE ratios (ICERs) were calculated as incremental cost per unintended pregnancy (UP) avoided. Efficiency frontier was plotted to identify cost-effective methods. Uncertainty was explored through sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The implant was on the efficiency frontier along with combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) and copper IUD. Implant avoids between 0.75% and 3.53% additional UP per person-year compared to copper IUD and second generation COC, respectively, with an ICER of €2,221 per UP avoided compared to copper IUD. For the 240,000 French women currently using the implant, up to 8,475 UPs and up to 1,992 abortions may be prevented annually. CONCLUSION: With more unintended pregnancies avoided and comparable costs to copper IUD, the implant is a cost-effective option among long-term and short-term reversible contraceptive methods.

Clinical practice guidelines for contraception by the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

The French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF) has released its first comprehensive recommendations for clinical practices in contraception, to provide physicians with an updated synthesis of the available data as a basis for their practice. The organizing committee and the working group adopted the objective methodological principles defined by the French Authority for Health (HAS) and selected 12 themes relevant to medical professionals' clinical practices concerning contraception. The available literature was screened through December 2017 and served as the basis of 12 texts, reviewed by experts and physicians from public and private practices, with experience in this field. These texts enabled us to develop evidence based, graded recommendations. Male and female sterilization, as well as the use of hormonal treatments not authorized for contraception ("off-label") were excluded from the scope of our review. Specific practical recommendations are provided for the management of contraception prescription, patient information concerning effectiveness, risks, and benefits of the different methods, patient follow-up, intrauterine contraception, emergency contraception, local and natural methods, contraception in teenagers, in women after 40, for women at high thromboembolism or cardiovascular risk, and for those at of primary cancer or relapse. The short- and mid-term future of contraception depends mainly on improving the use of currently available methods. This includes reinforced information for users and increased access to contraception for women, regardless of their social and clinical contexts. The objective of these guidelines is to aid in enabling this improvement.

Effectiveness and cost of contraception in France (FACET study): a cohort study from the French National Healthcare Insurance Database.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and costs associated with contraceptive methods based on real-world data in France. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort study based on data from a representative sample of the French National Healthcare Insurance Database (Echantillon Généralistes des Bénéficiaires (EGB)) was performed between January 1st 2006 and December 31st 2012. Women aged 15 years or older and users of at least one reimbursed contraceptive method between January 1st 2012 and December 31st 2012 were selected. The outcome of interest was unintended pregnancy, defined as pregnancies occurring after at least one month since the dispensation of a contraceptive method. The mean annual costs of contraceptive methods (in 2012 Euros) were collected in the database from a health system perspective. Costs were expressed for the first year of use, considering the next years of use and taking into account or not the cost of unplanned pregnancies. RESULTS: A population of 48,090 women representative of the 4,664,730 French women with a reimbursed contraceptive method was identified in the EGB in 2012: 68.6% used at least one reimbursed oral contraception (OC), 30.2% used at least one intrauterine devices (IUD) (LGN-IUS 52 mg, 17.6%; copper, 13.1%) and 5.1% used at least one etonogestrel implant. Unplanned pregnancies rates ranged from 0.6% with LNG-IUS 52 mg and 0.8% with the etonogestrel implant to 4.8% with 1st and 2nd generation combined OCs. The mean annual costs of contraception for the first year of use ranged from €145 for 1st-2nd generation combined oral contraceptions (COCs) to €308 for LNG-IUS 52 mg taking into account the next years of use, the etonogestrel implant was associated with the lowest mean annual cost (€88). When costs of unplanned pregnancies were taken into account, the mean annual cost of contraception for the first year of use was lower for progestin-only OC (€251) and copper IUD (€257) compared to etonogestrel implant (€300) and LNG-IUS 52 mg(€323). CONCLUSION: This real-world study suggests that Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) (i.e. implant and IUDs) should be considered for a broader use to prevent unplanned pregnancies and related abortions in France both from a public health and economic perspective.

Elective abortion: Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

The number of elective abortions has been stable for several decades. Many factors explain women's choice of abortion in cases of unplanned pregnancies. Early initiation of contraceptive use and a choice of contraceptive choices appropriate to the woman's life are associated with lower rates of unplanned pregnancies. Reversible long-acting contraceptives should be favored as first-line methods for adolescents because of their effectiveness (grade C). Ultrasound scan before an elective abortion must be encouraged but should not be obligatory (professional consensus). As soon as the embryo appears on the ultrasound scan, the date of pregnancy is estimated by measuring the crown-rump length (CRL) or, from 11 weeks on, by measuring the biparietal diameter (BPD) (grade A). Because reliability of these parameters is ±5 days, the abortion may be done if measurements are respectively less than 90 mm for CRL and less than 30 mm for BPD (professional consensus). A medically induced abortion, performed with a dose of 200 mg mifepristone combined with misoprostol, is effective at any gestational age (Level of Evidence (LE) 1). Before 7 weeks, mifepristone should be followed 24-48 h later by misoprostol, administered orally, buccally, sublingually, or even vaginally followed if needed by a further dose of 400 µg after 3 h, to be renewed if needed after 3 h (LE 1, grade A). After 7 weeks, administration of misoprostol by the vaginal, sublingual, or buccal routes is more effective and better tolerated than by the oral route (LE 1). Cervical preparation is recommended for systematic use in surgical abortions (professional consensus). Misoprostol is a first-line agent for cervical preparation at a dose of 400 µg (grade A). Vacuum aspiration is preferable to curettage (grade B). A uterus perforated during surgical aspiration should not routinely be considered to be scarred (professional consensus). An elective abortion is not associated with a higher risk of subsequent infertility or ectopic pregnancy (LE 2). The medical consultation before an elective abortion generally does not affect the decision to end or continue the pregnancy, and most women are sufficiently certain about their choice at this time. Women appear to find the method used most acceptable and to be most satisfied when they were able to choose the method (grade B). Elective abortions are not associated with an increased rate of psychiatric disorders (LE 2). However, women with psychiatric histories are at a higher risk of psychological disorders after the occurrence of an unplanned pregnancy than women with such a history (LE 2). For surgical abortions, combined hormonal contraceptives - oral or transdermal - should be started on the day of the abortion, while the vaginal ring should be inserted 5 days afterwards (grade B). For medical abortions, the vaginal ring should be inserted in the week after mifepristone administration, while the combined contraceptives should begin the same day as the misoprostol or the day after (grade C). Contraceptive implants should be inserted on the same day as a surgical abortion, and may be inserted the day the mifepristone is administered for medical abortions (grade B and C respectively). In case of medical abortion, the implant can be inserted the same day the mifepristone is administered (grade C). Both the copper IUDs and levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be inserted on the day of the surgical abortion (grade A). After medical abortions, an IUD can be inserted in 10 days after mifepristone administration, after ultrasound scan verification of the absence of an intrauterine pregnancy (grade C).

Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: The contraceptive efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization is well documented. The objective of this study was to compare procedure success, patient tolerance, and procedure time of Essure micro-insert hysteroscopic sterilization with or without anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Between February 2002 and May 2005, one operator performed 140 sterilization procedures in this prospective study: the first 70 were performed using local anesthesia and the following 70 began without administration of anesthesia. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in their demographic characteristics. Successful bilateral micro-insert placement in the first 70 cases, utilizing paracervical block, was 82.8% and did not differ significantly from the next 70 cases, without anesthesia (91.4%). A similar number of patients in each group received additional anesthesia. Report of procedure pain did not differ significantly between the groups: 87.1% reported moderate or less pain with the paracervical block, compared with 91.4% in the group without anesthesia. Duration of surgery was significantly shorter without anesthesia: 11.2+/-6.3 min vs. 25.0+/-8.0 min (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of anesthesia does not appear to affect the procedure completion success rate or patient tolerance of this hysteroscopic sterilization procedure.